The result is the same as in any unregulated industry - companies can make enormous amounts of money at the expense of unwilling or unknowing participants. But data mines, unlike oil wells and coal mines, don't have any regulations or standards in place.
Techies like to say "data is the new oil." New technologies have made data mining, the practice of analyzing and profiting from vast amounts of consumer information, easier than ever. We stand behind the Right to Know Act in its current form and hope others - individuals and companies alike - will join the cause toward a more transparent tomorrow." Increased transparency will definitively create a greater level of trust between online entities and thus further drive innovation. "Individuals have the right to know how companies collect and share their information, and companies should value this user trust instead of running away from it. "To say that user knowledge impacts profitability sounds particularly shortsighted," said Ethan Oberman, CEO of SpiderOak, the 'Zero-Knowledge' privacy cloud technologies provider. It appears as though these billion-dollar businesses think that increased transparency just might impact their profits. Presently, it won't be discussed until January of next year, at the earliest. Their lobbyists have twice delayed the bill from being heard in front of the California State Legislature. The ultimate goal is transparency - to better educate you about who and what has access to your data.Ī gaggle of tech giants from Google to Facebook to Microsoft want to stop the bill's passage. The Right to Know Act requires companies to disclose what information they have gathered about you and with whom they have shared this information.
California AB1291 - the 'Right to Know' Act - is slated to change all this. Then your information is packaged and sold, all in the name of profit.Ĭurrently, companies are trying to do everything they can to hide this simple fact - that they are gathering and then selling this information about you. Companies are gathering every piece of personal data they can get their hands on, including your browsing habits, physical location and the applications you use on your computer, phone or tablet. Synchronizing with server (this could take a while).SAN FRANCISCO, CA-(Marketwired - May 23, 2013) - If you are connected to the Internet at the moment, then there is a pretty good chance your information is being collected. Please enter a name for the new device: FreeNAS
To reinstall a device, enter the id (leave blank to set up a new device): I was then able to login and add my server from the # SpiderOakONE -setup=. I did this running this command: cp -R opt/SpiderOakONE/lib/* /usr/local/share/spideroak/. Under opt/SpiderOakONE/lib/ are the files you want to place in /usr/local/share/spideroak/. This produces 3 directories: etc, opt, usr. I then extracted SpiderOakONE-7.2.0-slack_tar_圆4.tgz. I then went into /usr/local/share/spideroak/ and removed everything recursively. What I did at this point was backup: # tar zcvf SpiderOakONE-6.0.tgz /usr/local/share/spideroak/* Ok, so after getting it setup, I was getting the error above about 'SS元_GET_SERVER_CERTIFICATE'. I think the one from the guide was kldload linux, I think I also executed kldload linu圆4 and this fixed some other issues. Also note that there were still commands you had to run as root outside of the jail. The current version of SpiderOakONE from SpiderOak is 7.2.0. Right now the current version from FreshPorts is 6.0_1 from. However, it will not be the current release.
#SPIDEROAK SUPPORT INSTALL#
Note that you no longer need to modify version numbers in the Makefile or download the SpiderOak software, running 'make install clean' will find that the package is not there and will download it for you. So, I went through the install guide I mentioned before.
#SPIDEROAK SUPPORT VERIFICATION#
There is a SpiderOak help article titled SSL Certificate Verification Error, that basically says you are expected to have a current version of SpiderOak, otherwise you could receive errors that the SSL certificate cannot be verified. If anyone else stumbles across this later, I found the issue.
0 kommentar(er)
